Could you please state your name and occupation?

Could you please detail your qualifications to the court? (Mention Navy)

And how did you become involved in this case? 

What resources did you review to draw conclusions about the Hepburn Dive on July 7?

And have you reached any conclusions about the events of that day? 

Should Lee Allen have been diving that day? (No because stage 2 hypertension/ Neptune was unaware)

How dangerous was it for Lee to be diving in general? (Not overly, but at Hepburn depths things are different)

Were there any other causes for concern with Lee's diving before the 7th?

And are you familiar with the Article "Scuba Diving 101,"?

And according to that article how would multiple dives to depths below 100ft, which was the case on July 6, affect a diver? (More susceptible to the affects of narcosis, uses more oxygen)

So was it unusual for Lee to have been struggling more than usual that day?

When diving, who is responsible for combating the effects of nitrogen narcosis?

In your professional medical opinion, is it likely that narcosis alone caused Lee to not follow instructions and continue to explore the Hepburn wreck?

So did Rodgers made the right call in surfacing without Lee? (It wasn't a decision, he had to surface or drown)

To give us a quick idea of what the numbers say, how many liter bars of oxygen did Rodgers go down with that day? (7200)

And how many were needed for the whole dive according to your calculations? (7343)

So it he had not ascended when he did, there was a good chance he could have drowned?