Response from Martin O'Malley about cove point
Didn't answer the question. A good reason to send more mail?
posted almost 11 years ago
Hey everyone! So the first thing I did when I got home for thanksgiving was read Martin O'Malley's response to the letter I sent about the proposed construction of a Liquified Fracked Gas plant.
I wrote that it would make Fracking economically probable in Maryland, that it would endanger human safety and biodiversity, as well as the future of our coastlines with rising sea levels.
It was really disappointing! First, he calls Cove Point "the proposed expansion of the Dominion Cove Point LNG Terminal," which completely minimizes the scope of the construction.
The rest of the mail doesn't mention environmentalism at all. It just talks about unrelated things Maryland is doing.
It sounds to me like he's looking to get more mail from us asking why he didn't answer the question! What do you think? Did you all get letters like this too?
I wrote that it would make Fracking economically probable in Maryland, that it would endanger human safety and biodiversity, as well as the future of our coastlines with rising sea levels.
It was really disappointing! First, he calls Cove Point "the proposed expansion of the Dominion Cove Point LNG Terminal," which completely minimizes the scope of the construction.
The rest of the mail doesn't mention environmentalism at all. It just talks about unrelated things Maryland is doing.
It sounds to me like he's looking to get more mail from us asking why he didn't answer the question! What do you think? Did you all get letters like this too?
