Matthew Eck, common ancestry to two different species, etc
I am just wondering why you didn't respond when I countered you on your factual claim made above. A whole 4 days has gone by yet you have not responded, why is that? Is it true that you don't know much about biology? Did toads and bullfrogs both get off of Noah's Ark, or not? Some would call this Trollbait, me included, but what the fuck son?
"
Publisher: Natural History Museum http://www.nhm.ac.uk/business-centre/publishing/books/animals/frogs-and-toads/indes.html
Frogs and Toads is a comprehensive guide to this large, diverse and important group of animals. With more than 5,800 species currently identified, frogs and toads are the most familiar and most abundant amphibians on the planet.
From the smooth, damp animals that leap about to the warty species that tend to run or walk, Chris Mattison describes the evolution and classification of frogs and toads, highlighting distinctive and notable species and providing detailed information about each of the 49 recognised families. "
Interspecies development like bullfrogs and toads?
Eck, talking small changes, scorpians and spiders are closely related gene wise and anatomy wise.
Though there are thousands of separate families and genus, orders, etc, I find it hard to believe that you think that changes occur, but don't think that there isn't evidence for interspecies common ancestry.
This is not a spider, btw.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amblypygi
Would you also like to concede that you don't know much about biology?