50 years ago institutional racism was rife in the American south. States created laws designed to limit or stop the voting of African-American citizens.

The Voting Rights act of 1965 changed all that.

While most people think the act was a success, there are some today who want to challenge a major provision of the law.

This provision, Section 5, requires states with a history of voter suppression to gain approval from the US justice department before changing election laws or procedures. 

In the past 30 years, the Justice Department has used the law to strike down more than 200 discriminatory laws in the state of Alabama alone.

Still today, Members of an Alabama County want the law changed and have taken their argument to the Supreme Court.

So why is Shelby County, Alabama challenging this law?

According to their lawsuit the, “Dire local conditions” that once made this law a necessity no longer exist.  They believe that the legislation achieved its goal as African Americans and Hispanics wield  significant political power.

They suggest section 5 is creating an opportunity for discrimination against white people. 

However, Ernest Montgomery, a current city council member in Calera, Alabama takes the opposing view.

When he was running for office the city officials redrew his district map because of a population boom in minorities. 

Montgomery told CBS News the representation under the old map was 67% African American and under the new map the number decreased to 28%.

After The boundary changes Montgomery, an African-American lost his seat. Due to Section 5 however, the Justice Department demanded a new election in the district restoring the old election map. Montgomery won the re-vote. 

Is discrimination dead? Will the Supreme Court overturn a law which was so favorably renewed?  Share your thoughts.